Sure, first cover the costs. But then, as ByteHamster said, more money will most likely be available.
Because we’re discussing here how to use the money, before we’re starting to collect it
It’s already been stated that we don’t want to pay developers - being in cash or via bounties. So this won’t be an option.
This I really don’t understand AntennaPod can perfectly stay a free, friendly to use app that is sufficient to serve general podcast needs. I don’t see the contradiction. (Of course, we wouldn’t do any fund-raising promotion to get more money - so I agree with you to some extent.)
Both to @Matth78 and @Podder: this was exactly the reason why we’re interested in collecting money. To recall ByteHamster:
In other words, stickers & t-shirts/hoodies could help promote the app both to regular users and potential contributors.
Basically we hope to get more people like you and simply thank them, not with money but with small token (e.g. a sticker or t-shirt).
Sure. I could do it, you folks might possibly help out. And I don’t have a clue about coding, so there’s no risk that it’ll lead to less development time
Good question. When we would go for Open Collective, we can designate a few people that can claim money, and one that can approve claims. They’re claims, because the money has always first to be spend by the person (e.g. I would order & pay stickers, and then get money back via Open Collective). For every claim, an explanation needs to be added as well as an invoice. That information is public, so anyone can see what the money is spent on. The Ferdi Open Collective is a great example of this.
If there’ll be a lot of money, then yes, a (legal) entity would be better. But while I think we’d have enough money for ‘merch’ and promotion materials, I don’t think we would be collecting masses of money. So an entity (for now at least) would probably be overkill. The time needed would be limited as the Open Collective legal entity does all the tax work.
As a (former) environmental activist, I find that a very good point But I think the ‘greater good’ can be served with more Open Source users & contributors. And at the same time we can (decide to) source good products (e.g. GOTS certified t-shirts) and offset our environmental impact.